i'm staring down my last 2 days here at unicef house on 44th street in manhattan - with a meeting this afternoon on "can MDGs [millennium development goals] be achieved without greater equity?" and tomorrow a grand meeting of all unicef's hoi-poloi to finalize the organization's plan for haiti reconstruction before the SUPER grand meeting of the whole united nations on the same topic later on in the week.
all these technical updates/meetings/workshops i've been able to attend this last year have been by far the best aspect of my job at unicef - i would have never had access to such high-level discussions before, seeing how things actually work, how development theory is debated and put into practice by a UN agency. i have written on these topics again and again on this poor little blog from my desk here, venting frustration or bursts of thought that i can no longer channel into term papers or essays. so in the spirit of ending this chapter of my life, let me summarize what i've learned (if any of you care to take a gander at this LONG LONG post):
you see, i read this really interesting
article, which discusses Harvard professor Lant Pritchett's ideas of how the aid industry/development world is like a piano recital: there are a lot of bad performances you have to sit through, but those mediocrities ultimately allow piano geniuses to rise up and shine. so, the point is that a lot of international development work is really ineffective, but that is to say it isn't all worthless, as certain stellar ideas and projects do build off the lessons learned from the mediocrity and ultimately do something worthwhile and brilliant.
now this is potentially problematic to me for many reasons, but also a really good way to describe what i saw at unicef: there is a whole heap-load of bureaucratic machinery going on in this building, and also in the UNDP building across the street. there are thousands of employees working in these two agencies alone (not to mention USAID, CIDA, SIDA, WFP, WHO, DFID, I could go on...), many of whom do nothing but perpetuate said-machinery. which is very disheartening. BUT it is as Pritchett says: there really are certain pockets of brilliance hidden amidst all that.
one such is unicef's support of the senegalese-based NGO,
TOSTAN. a few weeks ago, the founder of TOSTAN came to unicef offices, along with marietou diarra, a woman from rural senegal who went through a TOSTAN-run community women's empowerment programme and has since become a prominent and incredibly effective anti-female genital cutting (FGC) advocate in the country. she lost 2 young daughters to the procedure, and now travels around from village to village, opening up the dialogue with other women (and men) on what their experiences have been with FGC, and why this tradition persists, despite the universal health risks and damage it inflicts on women and young girls.
marietou is part of a legion of women TOSTAN has educated and now supports as grassroots advocates, and through their efforts, an estimated 85% of villages in senegal have now abandoned female genital cutting.
85%.this is
utterly astounding. listening to marietou speak and weep as she told of her experience and how her life has dramatically improved was so empowering and invigorating that i was able to say, yes, aid and international development
do in a certain sense work - but just like Pritchett says, it works at the same time that a vast hoarde of failed efforts go forward.
the problem is getting rid of all those failed efforts, streamlining the bureaucratic machinery: because honestly, is it all really necessary? but then again, with the frailty inherent in human functions, i doubt it is possible that every development effort will end up like TOSTAN. nothing in life works that way. and yet! why do so many continue to sit comfortably or complacently as cogs in these development wheels? we all (people who work in this field, that is) need to be much more vigilant in ensuring that we cut out the chaff and lift up those organizations or individuals who have
real potential to alleviate suffering and institute sustainable change towards poverty reduction. (viz. people like marietou diarra.)
and there you have it, a year at unicef distilled into one blogpost. i could keep going on and write a novel about it all, really. and if i keep going this post will soon be one. so! if you're intersted/curious and would like to discuss more, let's please skype whilst i'm in berlin.
otherwise,
FIN.